Asia and the environment
- This topic has 14 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 17 years, 9 months ago by
Anonymous.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 29, 2006 at 2:07 pm #3826
Rob_Hugo@PortNW
KeymasterAn article from last week's LA Times was really interesting. It was about a 5% tax on disposable chopsticks in China! Sounds kind of funny until you realize the staggering number of trees that have to be cut down to make the chopsticks. (China makes 45 billion pairs per year! That takes 25 million trees! Yikes!) The Chinese are pretty upset over the tax because of its potential to "end a five thousand year old tradition." I doubt that this will, in any way, force people to use their fingers or resort to using forks. I think Beijing is taking a step in the right direction by imposing this new tax. It shows that they're serious about the welfare of the environment.
June 7, 2006 at 1:32 am #21526Anonymous
GuestDid anyone read yesterday’s LA Times article about China’s pollution? Industrial growth, modern development, and urban encroachment are leading to grassland and wetland degradation and desertification. According to this article, 1,000 NEW cars are driven EVERY DAY in Beijing alone. By the time Beijing hosts the Olympics in 2008, there may be up to 3.5 million motorists on the road! The ‘good’ news is that China seems wiling to acknowledge this problem. Pollution and negligence affects every corner of our world. We all share the same air, water, food, and even diseases. Awareness is the first step to recovery. I think that the US and China really have to make a concerted effort to curb the release of carbon dioxide, chemicals, toxins, and other nasty pollutants into the atmosphere. Also, I think a larger effort has to be made in the preservation of forests, marshlands, oceans, mountains, icebergs, and other natural habitats. China is not the only country turning this world into a toxic waste dump. The United States has been doing it for the last one hundred years! China has admitted that “it will be difficult to get local officials to give up their economic interests for the sake of the environment” according to Times Staff writer Ching-Ching Ni. Uh… sound familiar to anyone???!
August 4, 2006 at 3:04 am #21527Anonymous
Guesthttp://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14181622/
Second Chinese city orders mass dog slaughter:
Previous cull, intended to curb spread of rabies, was heavily criticizedI wasn't exactly sure where to place this on the forum, but it does have to do with the environment in China, as well as the health care system. I really don't know much about how animals are treated in China or other parts of Asia. I've always been an animal lover, so of course, this article saddened me, but I try not to judge other cultures by my own cultural standards. However, beating dogs to death so rabies won't spread seems extreme. Can anyone else comment on how animals are treated in Asia? What kind of systems exist, if any, for strays? It seems like there's a better way of eliminating rabies other than beating animals to death. Are dogs as popular as pets in Asian countries as they are in U.S.? What could people in the U.S. do to help?
August 14, 2006 at 3:40 pm #21528Anonymous
GuestI am quite distraught about the article. I'd like to know how their pet dogs are treated in China too. But according to the article I read, it seems that people there were quite upset about this whole thing. Some groups in China and small animal protection associations are planning to file a lawsuit aganst the local government. I'm still having a difficult time imagining this whole thing. It's so unreal. I'd like to know what we could do about it too, rather than spread the words in the forums.
August 15, 2006 at 1:55 am #21529Anonymous
GuestI did see a segment on the news the other night that PETA is launching a petition that you can sign that they will be sending to the Chinese government. Also, PETA is calling for a boycott of Chinese products until the slaughter stops. The news show that I watched, "Tucker, with Tucker Carlson" on MSNBC had an interesting discussion about how pets, especially dogs, are viewed in China. The sad thing is that the government is knocking on doors and killing even pet dogs, as the article mentions, despite their owners' pleas. A correspondent on the show said that dogs in particular have not really been given rights as they are in America because dogs are seen as a bourgeois possession. So, if you want to help, check out the PETA website and sign the petition, etc. Although I love animals, I don't always agree with PETA and its tactics, but this one sounds like a good thing. I hope this stops--especially the slaughter of beloved pets.
February 26, 2007 at 2:51 pm #21530Anonymous
GuestI just finished reading an article from the Washington Post entitled, "Mild Weather Takes Edge Off Chinese Ice Festival," and the journalist writes about how unseasonably warm temperatures are causing the ice sculptures in Harbin, China to melt at a faster rate.
(Maybe Al Gore should be a guest speaker at Harbin?)
Apparently, citizens in this northeastern Chinese community are concerned about their arts melting before the holidays are over. The ice festival also attracts many visitors to the city, and generates money into the local economy. Many people are concerned that if the warming trend continues to occur, annual tourists will cut their visits short, or not show up at all.
One thing that jumped out at me was the comment about China being the second largest nation to contribute green house gases. I guess I shouldn't be surprised-- but to me, China seemed like it just started springing up. I haven't really heard about China until I entered college. It wasn't until when Mr. Dube mentioned that China consumes about 47% of the world's cement, and this article alluding to China's heavy pollution did it really sink in that China's been pretty busy and becoming a nation in the forefront.
In exchange for a booming economy, China faces a looming environmental problem that have already made its presence known--so how is China going to handle this? :~
March 6, 2007 at 1:47 pm #21531Anonymous
GuestI have an interest in earth science, so when I read articles on how the environment of the earth is being influenced by humans, I am always amazed at how much damage to the earth humans have contributed in such a short time.
In today's LA Times World Section, I stumbled upon an article about the pollutants of Asian industries responsible for increasing the severity of storms in the Pacific. For about twenty years, the industrial growth of Asian countries have largely increased the size of storms from around 20-50%! It was reported that the pollutants are causing the earth's atmosphere to heat up, and are responsible for the increased air pollution of major cities on the west coast (S.F., L.A.).
It's interesting how the U.S. pollutants was swept over to Europe, and recently, Asian pollutants are being picked up by the wind and is lingering over the U.S. Half a decade ago, I was reading about the U.S. causing damage to forests in Canada. Now, Americans aren't the only one the Canadians need to worry about, Asians might cause the Canadian glaciers to melt at an even faster pace. Yikes!
April 4, 2007 at 8:13 pm #21532Anonymous
GuestOn its April 1st issue, there was a year long investigation reported by the Washington Post on illegal logging and China's involvement in this activity. It proved to be an extemely interesting read; especially when I read about all the companies that the wood eventually wind up in.
China is one of the world's leading finished wood manufacturer. Wood would be purchased from various countries (Burma, Gabon, Russia, Brazil, Indonesia, etc.) and processed in China, then sold to companies like Ikea and Home Depot. Except that a large percentage of the logging is illegal. The percentage of forest and tropical forest land in the above mentioned countries are dwindling at a rapid pace and many environmentalists and citizens are concerned about the affects of the logging. Incidentally, China's own forest lands are increasing.
In order to keep up with the demands of western countries for wood products, China is venturing out to different countries and cutting down massive amounts of timber, some are even endangered species of trees. Thanks to government and military officials turning a blind eye, Chinese bribary, and various 'legal' loggings done due to loop holes, several of the countries are facing deforestation. The fast logging of tropical forest is alarming environmentalist and animal rights activists. Habitats and animals are being destroyed due to the cutting of trees and scientists are afraid that there will be great ramifications in the very near future.
While forests are decreasing elsewhere, the Chinese government has strictly enforced logging bans in certain parts of the country. This does not stop the wood industry from increasing their production. In fact, production increased greatly. Many Chinese loggers are making big bucks from all of this. They pay trivial amounts of money to have permission to cut the wood, but make exponentially more when it comes down processing and selling the wood.
There are some great satellite photos of the deforestation in parts of Burma and several other photos of the logging industry in the article.
July 23, 2007 at 5:49 pm #21533Anonymous
GuestI was intrigued by the mention of China imposing a tax on chopsticks. I wonder if this is an effort to cut down on the usage or a way to pay for their disposal? Does anyone know about recycling programs in China? I wonder if there are already systems in place that could promote the recycling of chopsticks or if this would be new territory? I think it would be interesting if China took the example set by grocers who offer discounts if you bring your own bag and offered discounts to people who bring their own chopsticks.
This is a subject that I may actually have the desire to research...
July 23, 2007 at 6:05 pm #21534Anonymous
GuestWhen the Olympics come to town I believe the host city generally expands its public transportation system to cope with the influx of tourists. I am curious if Beijing is able to improve its transportation systems in a way that will address the issues of tourism for the Olympics and encourage less use of cars by local people long-term? This could be a great opportunity for Beijing to become a "green" city.
July 24, 2007 at 9:24 am #21535Anonymous
GuestHaving a greener Beijing would be a great idea. Can you imagine the population plus the mass usage of motor vehicles? Yikes. But I still think that the idea of owning a car still hasn't lost its appeal to many modern-entering-the-global-market;-being-part-of-the-fastest-growing-country-because-there-is-more-money-in-the-economy consumers.
I think of the LA Metro, and it's not on the scale of the Bay Area, Chicago, or New York's mass public transportation. The Metro might be slowly increasing, but I don't know many people who take advantage of this form of commute.
In Beijing, more people might travel through public transportation due to lack of funds but unless China learns from other countries about energy supplies and greenhouse gases (at least enough to realize the dangers) then the desire for material goods and the evil of consuming everything one can just because one can do so, is well, not going away. We tend to want more...More...MORE! 🙁
July 24, 2007 at 6:28 pm #21536Anonymous
GuestI just read an article in a children's magazine (Faces, May 1998) about pink dolphins in the waters around Hong Kong. I had never heard of them before! There were a couple of pictures in the magazine but I also did a google image search and found many more amazing pictures of these pink dolphins.
They are only found in one place in the world and are few in numbers. About a dozen years ago some environmental groups began bringing attention to the little-know pink dolphins because they were feared to be in danger. Construction of a local airport was impacting the environment of the dolphins and the blasting was thought to be responsible for many pink dolphins washing ashore with internal injuries or dead. Current dangers include the facts that they live in a very busy shipping area and face pollution, overfishing, and human interactions.
The attention brought to the pink dolphins by environmental groups contribued to the decision to make the pink dolphin the official mascot of the 1997 Hong Kong Handover.
July 30, 2007 at 2:39 pm #21537Anonymous
GuestAnother great article from May 2007 issue of Faces magazine (for kids) is about the controversial Three Gorges Dam which is almost completed in China. The article discusses the pros and cons of building the Three Gorges Dam.
Some pros: The increased energy will help the economy, the dam prevents floods that have killed thousands, and it produces the energy of 15 nuclear power plants.
Some cons: the dam has caused the displacement of more than 1,300 significant sites and their artifacts, the surrounding environment has changed and is thretening many species of animals as well as wetland areas, entire communities have been displaced including many farmers who now have land that does not support farming. Additional concern: The dam sits on a major fault line.
I think my students would enjoy reading this and could have a great debate/socratic seminar on the pros and cons of buiding this dam.
July 30, 2007 at 7:05 pm #21538Anonymous
GuestYet another great article from a children's magazine:
Calliope, February 2007 issue Topic: Made in ChinaChina's Beijing Genomics Institute mapped the rice genome in 2002. The debate in the article is about the pros and cons of genetically modified rice. With China's rapidly-growing population, more people need to be fed and it takes more and more farmland to grow the food to feed them. This "super-rice" could be a solution to the dilemna. Environmentalists are worried that if the modified rice accidently spread into the environment and mixed with natural strains of rice, it could damage the ecosystem. Large corporations prducing "super-rice" could take business away from poor farmers and then drive up the price. The Chinese government is monitoring the production of genetically modified plants, animals, and microorganisms and requiring that they be labeled with ingredients.
Another interesting fact: the average age of the genome project workforce in China is 23.
I think the pros and cons of genetically modified rice would be another great debate/socratic seminar topic for my students.
November 16, 2007 at 7:14 am #21539Anonymous
GuestGreat idea.... I agree that it is a good step in the right direction... Also, why could they not produce plastic ones, as I have seen here in the US? They are e-usable for a very long time, they look almost natural, they feel smooth and easy to manipulate... and China has has loads of raw materials to make plastic.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.