Hello group members,
Wow! What an amazing group. I found it refreshing to be truly collaborating with a group of outstanding teachers. I am really excited about the idea we came up with and the possiblities for the study tour.
I am attaching the document I typed up at the orientation, which outlines our idea.
Have a great day-
Dana
I was really thinking of a strong connection between the concept of the Great Wall of China and the proposed US/Mexico wall. Once again, I'm throwing out an idea or concept without thinking everything out, but we might be able to compare/contrast the two walls and find documents to explain the governments objectives for creating these giant visual structures.
I'm thinking that each of these walls were or may be constructed from this fear. I know that for Ancient China it was the thought of being attacked by people from the North or various other areas. But I think the people who have proposed the US/Mexico wall fear more of a financial or economic drain.
I think that this would be bit of architecture that would hook the students in.
I was reading through CSM today and there was a cover article entitled "China's messages to quell unrest" basically discussing how the Communist Party is trying to tap into various traditions .
"As Chinese leaders fret over rising peasant protests, political instablility, and a decay of traditional values, the Communist Party is experimenting with mulitple new messges--designed to capture the hearts and minds of ordinary people."
According to the article, the Communist Party is backing various campaigns such as opening a department of Confucianism at People's University, holding a Buddhist forum.
China has become a 'consumer Communist Party...a party based on marketing, not Maoism.'
I think this is especially important in the cities like Beijing that are preparing themselves for the 2008 Olympics, with the huge skyscrapers in the sky and turning into a completely modern city.
The article also states that "daily life and 'public space' continues to diversify. I wonder if that can be seen through the current architecture. I wonder if the architecture in a city is being modernized and constructed if that is also representational of what's going not only in the city with change, but also with the people who live in that city?
Hey LaRue:
I love your idea about comparing the two walls: it will take a wall close to the students' experience and compare it with a wall half way around the world--what a great way of connecting them to China!
Your marketing issue in the other post is interesting too: I'm almost finished with Peter Hessler's Oracle Bones: I'll address the book's topic in another post, but he does mention something about the marketing of Beijing for the Olympic bid. He was writing this book during Beijing's final inspection by the IOC, and there's marketing techniques (like having one thousand bicycle riders holding signs that promote the Olympic bid parading through the city) at work there.[Edit by="tsprague on Jun 24, 3:55:06 PM"][/Edit]
I have to recommend a book that is not about China but does address our topic of study. It is called Breaking Ground: Adventures in Life and Architecture by Daniel Libeskind. Libeskind is the architect selected to design the structure/memorial that will be built in the Twin Towers site. The book is a fascinating look into an architect's mind: as Libeskind mentions, buildings are like literature: "a great building--like great literature or poetry or music--can tell the story of the human soul" (Libeskind 4). He details many of his projects, from the Twin Towers project to a Jewish museum in Germany. In Libeskind's buildings, symbols and structure create a mood, a feeling, that he wants to convey. What will China's buildings convey: a desire for power? for control? for order? organization? routine? community? This book sounds like a great complement to what we will be studying in Chinese buildings! Libeskind puts it this way, "From the ruins of Byzantium to the streets of New York, from the peaked roof of a Chinese pagoda to the spire of the Eiffel Tower, every building tells a story, or better yet, several stories" (3).[Edit by="tsprague on Jun 24, 4:15:48 PM"][/Edit]
A couple of other notes about Hessler's Oracle Bones that are relevant to our topic of study: he compares the layout of Washington DC with Beijing, discussing how the layout of these cities (the buildings and the streets) convey a sense of political power. (This made me think of LaRue's comparison of the Great Wall and the potential wall at the US/Mexico border; could there be a second connection here--Washington DC and Beijing?
Hessler speaks of Old Beijing being characterized by hutongs, neighborhoods that consisted of "alleyways flanked by courtyard homes" (Hessler 174). Hessler says that the hutongs were disappearing by the 1990s--some were destroyed by Mao Zedong, who thought that these homes (with their walls and gates) were in the way of progress; others survived this assault (because Mao couldn't totally fulfill his vision due to a lack of financial support) but when Beijing boomed, these hutong were torn down in order to put up cheaply and quickly made apartment blocks. In his chapter "The Courtyard", Hessler chronicles the story of Old Zhao--a man who filed a lawsuit against the government to prevent the destruction of his courtyard home; he tried to get the Cultural Relics Bureau to declare his home a historical site. I won't tell you how it turns out, you'll need to read the book. (I know, you can probably figure this out without reading, but it's still a good book).
One final quote from Hessler, who, by the way, is an American working as a foreign correspondent in China: "Ever since childhood, like any Westerner, I had learned that the past was embodied in ancient buildings--pyramids, palaces, coliseums, cathedrals. Ionic, Doric, gothic, baroque--words I recall from junior-high lessons. To me, that was antiquity, but the Chinese seemed to find their past elsewhere" (185). Hey? Does this blow our idea for study? Hessler was saying that the Chinese didn't build monuments to last: "Chinese structures simply were't designed to withstand the centuries" (184). Okay, but the current structures, built to last or not, convey some meaning anyway, right?
I must admit I have several lesson plans brewing, but here is my idea for one that connects to our group's study: it's actually something I've already been working on, but I want to incorporate what I find in China to this lesson. The concept is this: in order for students to become deeper readers/thinkers (in history or in English) they need to encounter and understand not one text, but several. In other words, learning is an intertextual process. (Not my idea, obviously; find out more at NCTE.org: search David Bloome for the article). Here's my spin on this intertextual idea: I want students to understand that the skills that they develop while reading/analyzing literature are the same skills they will use when reading art, reading buildings, reading people--essentially, reading literature is making them better readers of the world. So, I try to bring in texts other than the piece of literature that we're reading for students to analyze (and to connect to the original text). The term "text" is used very loosely here: a text is anything that can be read/analyzed; anything that a "writing" can be created from--this definition allows for objects, paintings, toys, games, advertisements, my grandmother's quilt (another story) to be defined as texts. So students might look at a short story about grief, and then look at a mask that an African might wear to a funeral to show his/her grief--then students are asked to find a connection between the two, or better yet, students are asked to communicate what insight the second text (the mask) might give them into the first text (the short story). I've explored the same process with paintings: my students have traveled to the Latin American Museum of Art, on the hunt for paintings with a similar theme as one in The Great Gatsby, or for a painting in which the artist used a similar technique (like repetition) that Toni Morrison uses in Beloved. When encountering multiple texts, instead of focusing on one, students are challenged to think more deeply, to make more connections, to see relevance in their studies.
What's my point? Thank you if you're still reading. I want to find other "texts" in China that I can share with students, and that they can connect with texts that we are already reading in class. I am looking for three types of texts: ones that communicate grief (for my Thanatology class); ones that reveal something about Chinese culture (for my World Humanities class); ones that require the reader to use the language of literature (ie texts that cannot be discussed without using literary terms: juxtaposition, motif, symbol, theme, irony, mood, tone, etc: of course, this type of text will be used in all of my classes).
Now I said that this had some relevance to our topic of study: it does. I think that a lot of what I'll be able to use will come from Chinese/Japanese buildings: temples, political structures, etc. Power--a theme that is ubiquitous in literature--will be a theme that we find among the political structures in China. I'm sure that the trip will be full of intertextual moments!
Wow! Tracy those are some amazing ideas that I would love to explore further with you during the trip. There is also this text to self, text to others, etc., technique that I have heard of. I will try to find out more about it before we leave, it might apply to your idea. LaRue, I also like the two walls idea. I think this is something we could explore esspecially with all the focus on immigration in the US right now.
For me, I went ahead and created a power point presentation that outlines my plans. I am hoping to let our ideas manifest into what they will during our exploration of China and Japan. However, my goal is to try to find a conncetion within architecture that will allow students to compare each ancient civiliaztion unit from early humans to Rome by first looking at China and Japan.
I know we leave tomorrow so comments on my plan will most likely have to wait until we see each other in China, but nevertheless, I hope some of you have time to look it over. If not, I can share it while we are there.
Happy travels and I will see you all in China! Dana