Seminar Final Project Review List

First -- some procedural notes:
Post your draft lessons for review by July 5. Posting them earlier increases the time colleagues will have to comment upon them. Please create a new thread in the seminar forum for your lessons. Please title your thread: last name, name of lessons/unit.

Your lessons should be specific and detailed (e.g., don’t simply say, “read chapter 4 in the book,” give us full bibliographical information – author(s), title (ed #), place: publisher, year published and page numbers). If you’re drawing on web information, be sure to fully identify it as well. Here’s one standard model:
Author's Last Name, First Name Middle Initial. "Title of Content." Name of Web page. Name of organizational sponsor (not advertising sponsor), Date published or updated. Day Month Year of Access. Web address.
Please post your comments on your assigned lessons (and any others that interest you) by July 11. Final versions of your projects are due in our offices by July 15 (please note that this is a later date than originally listed in the seminar requirements handout). Send us hard copies of all materials used in the lessons (including photocopies of print (or web) reading assignments along with the lessons themselves. Please provide us with a digital copy of your lessons (it is easiest if you simply “burn” this to a cd). We will retain the digital copy for our records and will, after review, return the hard copy to you. Once your lessons have been approved, please post them to the lesson plan forum (create a new thread for your lesson): http://uschinaforum.usc.edu/forum56-lesson-plans.aspx.

A copy of the seminar requirements is attached.

In reviewing the lesson plans of others, please focus on these questions:
-- what skills are to be developed, what knowledge is to be acquired
-- can this lesson plan be executed (are the time and other expectations realistic, are the materials suitable, does it fit well with what the students will have already studied, with what they will next study)?
-- how might this lesson be improved (materials, methods)?

To post your review, please just click the "add reply" link. Please be sure that you review both of your assigned sets of lessons by July 11.

Thanks everyone!
edited by Clay Dube on 6/9/2011

USC/NCTA Spring 2011 ""East Asia since 1800"" Seminar Final Project Review List

To be reviewed Reviewers
Ashton, Sally Keo, Davy & Gamboa, Gamaliel

Aguilar, Alma Fraser, Mary & Kohen, Annet & Keo, Davy

Bacon, Carla Shah, Monica & Kohen, Annet & Keo, Davy

Cervantes-Wagner, Sylvia & Garcia, Monique Jauregui, Guillermina & Fraser, Mary & Kim, Rae

Ding, Lijie Aguilar, Alma & Shah, Monica

Fraser, Mary Garcia, Monique & Jauregui, Guillermina

Gamboa, Gamaliel Ashton, Sally & Neubauer, Bethany

Jauregui, Florentino Bacon, Carla & korb, Ronald

Keo, Davy korb, Ronald & Sakuma, Harue & Winkler, Robin

Kim, Rae Cervantes-Wagner, Sylvia & Meza, Rudy

Kohen, Annet Winkler, Robin & Gamboa, Gamaliel

korb, Ronald Neubauer, Bethany & Ashton, Sally

Meza, Rudy Jauregui, Guillermina & Aguilar, Alma

Neubauer, Bethany Jauregui, Florentino & Kohen, Annet

Sakuma, Harue Kim, Rae & Ding, Lijie

Shah, Monica Bacon, Carla & Sakuma, Harue

Winkler, Robin Jauregui, Florentino & Meza, Rudy