Japan at War An Oral History
- This topic has 5 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 3 months ago by
Anonymous.
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 28, 2010 at 11:47 am #4893
Rob_Hugo@PortNW
KeymasterI continue to love this format for the insight that it gives on the various subjects. I can remember when I was a student and I always loved it when teachers would tell these kinds of stories. I always wanted to be the kind of teacher that could tell stories to students that were outside the "textbook." For me it is what makes history come alive. Many of my students complain about learning about history - they don't like all the reading. They do like it however when I tell them stories - it some how helps them relate. I often get - why do we study history questions but once I tell them a story it becomes more relevant to them. The story about the Homeland and the quote about "congratulations - your husband is going to war" is something that we can compare to the various wars in our country. Certainly WW 2 was a similar act of pride contrasting to the Viet Nam War. In the story Life Goes On it is easy to talk about "their thousand-stitch belts" that would protect them. I think students are already aware of how our soldiers also do things for protection. Also talking about limited supplies is the kind of story that has meaning to students. The story about War Work - Making Balloon Bombs gives great insight to the sacrifices that children made for the war effort. So keep the oral histories coming -- I find them a great teaching tool.
June 1, 2010 at 8:08 am #28102Anonymous
GuestI also agree that personal histories create a much greater interest in past events. When individuals describe their unique experiences as the result of significant historical events-it gives relevance to these events. We all are humans and we can relate to feelings, emotions, fears, and prideful celebrations after a national triumph.
June 4, 2010 at 8:54 am #28103Anonymous
GuestOral histories are a great teaching tool! Making the balloon bombs showed how students went beyond sacrifices made for ones family to one's country, a concept that I think my students will find fascinating. I intend to incorporate certain excerpts from the book into my curriculum by team teaching with one of my colleagues (a history teacher who has already taken this course). Most cultures have a family orator in every generation to preserve traditions through storytelling. And in the classroom, put it in storytelling format and you have their attention.
June 7, 2010 at 11:28 am #28104Anonymous
GuestI think oral histories really give you a better feel for what went on during a specific time period. You might not get the exact accurate information, but that is what you have textbooks for. The oral histories show you how people really felt. They show you how people were really affected. They give you that more emotional connection to bring history to life. They are great ways for my students to connect with the subject.
June 8, 2010 at 3:58 am #28105Anonymous
GuestOral Histories I feel are often times more accurate than textbooks because they were part of the movement. It gives students true insight into the lives of the people living through a particular experience and allows them to connect more directly to the text. It is always fascinating to find two oral histories from opposing sides too and allow students to draw their own conclusions about what the truth was, which often meets between the two texts.
June 13, 2010 at 2:59 am #28106Anonymous
GuestThe problem with the textbook as opposed to the oral history is that the text book gets written by the "victors" whereas oral histories come from the people who lived the experiences. I have often joked with my students that the difference between a biography and an autobiography is that a biography is non-fiction. I do believe our own perceptions distort the truth, but knowing this while reading the oral histories it paints a much more vivid picture.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.