The cost of China's economic growth

Home Forums The cost of China's economic growth

Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #5459
    Rob_Hugo@PortNW
    Keymaster

    Here's a disturbing report on the human - and environmental - toll of China's rapid economic expansion. The site also has photographs - http://www.guardian.co.uk/china/story/0,,2128826,00.html

    Dust, waste and dirty water: the deadly price of China's miracle

    John Vidal, environment editor
    The Guardian
    Wednesday July 18, 2007

    Hundreds of millions of people are being made ill every year or dying prematurely from pollution caused by China's breakneck economic growth, a leading economic thinktank has concluded following an 18-month investigation.

    The OECD study, prepared at China's request, draws on work by the government, World Bank and Chinese Academy of Sciences to spell out the scale of the ecological crisis now engulfing the country, poisoning its people and holding it back economically.

    t says up to 300 million people are drinking contaminated water every day, and 190 million are suffering from water related illnesses each year. If air pollution is not controlled, it says, there will be 600,000 premature deaths in urban areas and 20m cases of respiratory illness a year within 15 years.

    China's water quality gives the researchers greatest concern. One third of the length of all China's rivers are now "highly polluted" as are 75% of its major lakes and 25% of all its coastal waters. Nearly 30,000 children die from diarrhoea due to polluted water each year.

    Although China is the world's fourth largest economy, growing 10% a year and closing rapidly on the US, Japan and Germany, its environmental standards are often closer to those in some of the poorest countries in the world, says the report. More than 17,000 towns have no sewage works at all and the human waste from nearly one billion people is barely collected or treated. Nearly 70% of the rural population has no access to safe sanitation.

    "A majority of the water flowing through China's urban areas is unsuitable for drinking or fishing. Some 300 million people drink contaminated water on a daily basis," says the report.

    Although China has tried to improve its air quality, it has not invested enough to keep up with the flood of people to its cities, many of which have some of the worst pollution in the world. The burning of more than 2bn tonnes of the dirtiest coal a year is costing the economy the equivalent of 3-7% of GDP (£8-15bn a year), according to the report. While no specific figure is given for the overall cost of China's pollution, in 2004 it was thought to be in the region of £32bn [$64 bn].

    "A healthy economy needs a healthy environment," said Mario Amano, deputy secretary-general of the OECD - the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development - in Beijing yesterday.

    The report estimates that 27% of the landmass of the country is now becoming desertified. Much of the country already suffers from water shortages, but the Chinese Academy of Sciences expects water demand to increase by nearly 50% in the next 40 years. Industry's share of this is expected to grow from 16% to 41%.

    Low environmental standards are now making people wary of buying Chinese goods, said Lorents Lorentsen, OECD's environmental director in Beijing yesterday. "If you have a reputation for being a polluted country, then you have a bad trademark abroad. It's very hard to sell pharmaceuticals, to sell food and feed from a country that has a reputation for being polluted," he said.

    #32773
    Anonymous
    Guest

    I think it is interesting to watch China in her process of rapid modernization. As I commented in another thread, I cannot help but notice many similarities in China's process with that of the United Staes in the early and mid part of the 20th Century. Poor working onditions, child labor, exploitation were common stories in turn of the nineteenth century American industry. Through the labor movement many of these ills were rectified. Government oversite in the form of the FDA and other regulating bodies would improve the quality products, but for the most part industry and the nation adopted a better living through chemistry, industrialization, and progress model.

    Such an outlook spurned the green revolution and extensive expansion into the chemical sector. Chemistry assisted farmers produce unheard of crops yeilds, and chemistry gave us plactic and all it countless uses we think little of today. The buy product of all of this was contamination and pollution on a huge scale. To this day many of the fish in LA harbor are polluted with heavy metals and organic residues from industries that died in the 1960's.

    China in this way seems much the same. She too will have her workers' struggles. The state will have to begin strict regulation of products if success on the global market is the goal, and environmentally minded Chinese must interject themselves with force into the national debate. My only question is will she turn blindly to science and technology to try and solve her problems. Examples abound the greates of which is the three-gorges dam project. In a quest for power to drive industry the entire environment and georgarphy of a section of southern China is being altered. The Hooover and Glen Canyon dams bring water to the Imperial Valley and the Salton Sea for agriculture, and this is now being reassessed in our nation. I beleive CHina should study a bit of American industrial history to try and avert some of the costly mistakes we made. Let us hope this happens soon, and let us hope they do not look toward desalination alon their coasts as a major way of solving their water problems.

Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.