Home Forums 10/25 - discussion-teaching through biography

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 28 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #17292
    Anonymous
    Guest

    The diary entries provide a great opportunity for a cross curricular unit- English and History.
    While students learn about World War 2, the diary entries give an authentic voice to the people and their experience that will be engaging for students.

    Here are some Lang Arts standards that could be used for this unit.

    CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.RI.11-12.1
    Cite strong and thorough textual evidence to support analysis of what the text says explicitly as well as inferences drawn from the text, including determining where the text leaves matters uncertain.

    CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.RI.11-12.6
    Determine an author's point of view or purpose in a text in which the rhetoric is particularly effective, analyzing how style and content contribute to the power, persuasiveness or beauty of the text.
    edited by ybanuelos on 10/25/2014

    #17293
    Anonymous
    Guest

    In US History, when do students usually learn about World War 2? Quarter 4?

    #17294
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Professor Yamashita provided us with some amazing diaries that provide us with a treasure trove of material that can be used in class. In particular, I like the Nakane diary of June 17, 1945. In it, this young lady describes her teachings in war and battle. In U.S. History, the debate over to drop the Atomic Bomb is one of the main standards for WWII. One of the arguments for dropping he bomb is the amount of deaths that would occur if the Allies invaded mainland Japan. Historians have used the Battle of Okinawa as an example of the resistance that would be put up by the Japanese Civilians. This young girl's account helps show why the decision was made to drop the bomb. If you can find an example from the Takahashi (the housewife) diary that shows how the Japanese civilians were fed up and ready to surrender, this would provide you with examples of both sides.

    #17295
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Audio available in English and Chinese, with English subtitles

    #17296
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Mulan: Five Versions of a Classic Chinese Legend, with Related Texts
    edited by Shiamin Kwa, Wilt L. Idema

    http://books.google.com/books?id=fHzXt8AHyhIC&pg=PR26&lpg=PR26&dq=Qiu+Jin+and+mulan&source=bl&ots=Em4urhhD6v&sig=m9QWs654AOGSQZHJktiQ7witgAo&hl=en&sa=X&ei=AyRMVMT4FIn4igKbxYGoDA&ved=0CCUQ6AEwAw#v=onepage&q=Qiu%20Jin%20and%20mulan&f=false

    This looks like a great resource for a unit on Qiu Jin and Mulan, with a gender studies/ feminism perspective.

    #17297
    Anonymous
    Guest

    I am determined to post before I sit down or it will be all over. Thank you for the ideas of using biographies to teach. I have been thinking of ways to use the information we have been receiving in my social studies for sixth grade. Today, the to use biographies to teach point-of-view was mentioned. Selections from the biographies of Hisako, Yasuo, and Mihoko could be used with context of the war. I could do this prior to my students' reading about Amelia Earhart as this will help them understand one of the theories about Amelia being a spy and held captive by Japanese warriors. Thank you.

    #17298
    Anonymous
    Guest

    The first words that come to mind when I hear the word kamikaze is fanatical, crazed, willing warriors who would gladly sacrifice themselves by crashing their planes into ships. After watching "Wings of Defeat", I learned that this wasn't true for the pilots. Many of the pilots were sad and depressed that they had to go and sacrifice themselves for their country. One pilot stated, "To some it might seem bold and courageous, but to us it was very grim and painful." He described the photo taken as his funeral portrait that had "the shadow of death all over it". Yet they followed the order out of a sense of responsibility to their country. All of the pilots tend to say the same thing about their experiences which is that they never talked about it with anyone. It wasn't something that one boasted about to others and especially not to family. they were supposed to show their loyalty and happiness on the outside, but many of them were dying on the inside thinking that "I might be next". one pilot blames the Emperor for the deaths of the kamikaze pilots. If only the emperor had ended the war six months earlier. He described it as, "They treated our lives as waste paper." I failed to think of these men as human beings probably because of the preconceived ideas I have about kamikaze pilots. Where id those ideas come from? Textbooks? Lectures in U.S. History? I don't exactly remember, but I do not want to give my students a one sided view of history. We need to give them as many perspectives as possible and teach them that their may be bias in every single one. We need to teach them about motive and tone so that they can figure out how reliable the sources are. It is so important to make sure that they are not improperly influenced to think only one way, our way.

    #17299
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Biographies are definitely a good way to glimpse into the past to get someone's perspective. I think using them to teach is great as long as the students have been thoroughly taught about how to watch for bias, tone, and motive. Many students think that because it is in a book that it is the honest truth, but they need to learn how to vet ideas of authors and even from primary sources. The Common Core standards are requiring students to use textual evidence to support their written arguments and ideas. They need to be taught what to look for and how to determine what parts of a document they should use. After that, then by all means biographies can be used. In class, I was wondering why Professor Dube was staying on the subject for so long. I thought he was just long winded on the subject. Now I see that he really wanted to hit home the real lesson that not all biographies are the same and motives change. I think everyone got the point and hopefully they will be aware of this when they use them in their teaching.

    #17300
    clay dube
    Spectator

    In terms of having a direct effect on people, few compare in the 20th century with these three Asians: Mao, Gandhi, and Nehru. Very different people with very different legacies.

    Let's sample three biographical accounts, the first of which is based mostly on what Mao said about himself.
    Snow, 1937 revised a bit by the author and edited by Chinese state publishers - http://uschinaforum.usc.edu/topic19682-session-7-1025-readings.aspx#post27597
    Read also, the review of Red Star and what Snow's biographer wrote about Snow's trip to meet Mao. You may also find the interview with an actor playing Snow interesting.

    Then, let's read the Communist Party's 1981 evaluation of Mao and the deMaoification beginning in 1979.
    http://uschinaforum.usc.edu/topic19682-session-7-1025-readings.aspx#post27593

    Li Zhisui was Mao's doctor for twenty-two years. Let's read a short selection of how Mao treated him and others at the start of the Cultural Revolution:
    http://uschinaforum.usc.edu/topic19682-session-7-1025-readings.aspx#post27596

    Then we have the bestselling 2005 book by Jung Chang and Jon Halliday. They weren't the first to shatter the myth of the battle of Dadu Bridge, but they have offered the most systematic and negative account of Mao. Here's a selection. Please also read the reviews of the book and watch Jung Chang's short video discussion.
    http://uschinaforum.usc.edu/topic19682-session-7-1025-readings.aspx#post27594

    Chang/Halliday's account stimulated some academics to attempt an evaluation of Mao. Was he a monster? I don't have a book excerpt for you, but do have some reviews of the Benton book.
    http://uschinaforum.usc.edu/topic19682-session-7-1025-readings.aspx#post27594

    There are many other biographies of Mao Zedong. Two popular ones are by Philip Short and Jonathan Spence.

    Finally, here is current Chinese leader Xi Jinping. He insists that all of the CCP era must be seen as a positive whole. He rejects the idea that the first three decades were bad and the good started after the death of Mao.

    "Mao is a great figure who changed the face of the nation and led the Chinese people to a new destiny..
    [Mao was a] "great proletarian revolutionary, strategist and theorist...
    "Revolutionary leaders are not gods, but human beings...
    "[We] cannot worship them like gods or refuse to allow people to point out and correct their errors just because they are great; neither can we totally repudiate them and erase their historical feats just because they made mistakes...

    Xi spoke at the 120th anniversary of Mao's birth: http://www.china.org.cn/china/2013-12/26/content_31015643.htm

    So - what do you make of Mao? What good, if any, did he accomplish? What bad policies or practices, if any, did can be attributed to him? How does he measure up?
    edited by Clay Dube on 10/26/2014

    #17301
    clay dube
    Spectator

    Of course, Deng Xiaoping's influence on China's rise and transformation is immense. Harvard's Ezra Vogel devoted 10 years to writing a giant biography of Deng:
    http://www.hup.harvard.edu/catalog.php?isbn=9780674055445 (includes a 20 minute video interview with Vogel)

    Here's a critical review of Vogel's biography:
    http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/23/books/review/deng-xiaoping-and-the-transformation-of-china-by-ezra-f-vogel-book-review.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

    Vogel discussed Deng's opening to the world and his effort to nourish science and technology in China during a visit to USC. Watch his talk at:
    http://china.usc.edu/ShowArticle.aspx?articleID=2632
    (also at YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yI01S6bfooU)
    (also at iTunes: https://itunes.apple.com/us/itunes-u/usc-u.s.-china-institute-speaker/id524459663?mt=10)

    #17302
    Anonymous
    Guest

    After our discussion of the Japanese pilot's biography, I couldn't shake the notion that kamikaze pilots may not have been as enthused at the idea of commiting suicide for the sake of Japan as I had always believed they were. Was it, then, a myth? Were kamikaze pilots not WWII's samurais? Although I will certainly be looking forward to viewing the documentary, "Wings of Defeat," I also read over an article that I found, one that shares an interview with a kamikaze pilot who had survived: http://www.historynet.com/a-kamikaze-who-lived-to-tell-the-tale.htm. Interestingly, the former pilot strips away the myth and says that many of the pilots, when they had heard of the mission, thought it ridiculous. In fact, he went on to say that only after the pilots had thought about it overnight--thinking of the shame and ostracization they may be bringing upon their families--that they had finally accepted.

    #17303
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Because of the quick note from class concerning Microsoft gaining a foothold in China, I looked it up. Interestingly, it's true! Apparently there was a 14-year ban on video consoles and games being brought into the country. The ban was in 2000, a year before the first Xbox was made available. China was not welcoming of the idea of violence in video games being offered to its youth. Here in America, sadly, even games with an "M" rating don't stay out of kids' hands for long. As far as Microsoft being allowed sales, there will still be plenty of regulations put in place. As of now, there are only ten games available to China's Xbox, and these games in particular are free from, what China believes to be, the influence of violence and the subsequent "corruption." Still, it's interesting to read further as to why Sony and Nintendo couldn't also make a stand.

    #17304
    Anonymous
    Guest

    I really enjoyed the look at biographies from a different perspective. In fifth grade, we have biographies and diaries in both our reading anthologies and social studies. In fifth grade we study the revolutionary war and children's experiences during this time, including Tories vs Patriots . I will use the Nine year old's diary and compare their feelings and experiences during this time of conflict. During the lecture, the pictures and the words gave me a an overwhelming sense of sadness as I know people's diaries today are being written around the world describing the horrors of war.and occupation. We have learned nothing. Sigh...

    #17305
    Anonymous
    Guest

    As a third grade teacher, I was happy to see that a nine-year-old girl's diary was included in the readings. My students have a better chance of understanding a little bit of what WWII was like through her and her experiences as opposed to the adults in the other biographies.
    I could also have my students write a diary entry very similar to the one Nakane wrote on May 21, 1945. She wrote about a fun climb up Mount Kuwayama. She described the trails, the excitement she felt, and discussed her lunch with peers. This year my students will have the good fortune of going on three field trips. I will have them write a diary entry modeled after Nakane's.

    #17306
    Anonymous
    Guest

    One of the GATE icons is "Multiple Perspectives," an opportunity for students to observe content through many lenses. As is made clear through the pilot's and the child's biography, perspectives on Japan's efforts during the war were not necessarily organic. From what we learned about the Japanese pilots, they looked forward to being with their brothers of war; however, this diary was written with the understanding that it would be read by the pilots' superiors. Also, through reading the child's biography, we see through adult eyes the militarizing of the children at even such early ages. For any such lesson, observing content though many lenses is highly beneficial for our students as they begin to formulate their own opinions about the worlds they live in.

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 28 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.