1/16/10 -Session 6a - Pitelka - Japan: The Meiji Transition

Home Forums 1/16/10 -Session 6a - Pitelka - Japan: The Meiji Transition

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 28 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #5281
    Rob_Hugo@PortNW
    Keymaster

    Hi everyone,

    Please reply to this message and share your thoughts about our January 16 morning session by Professor Morgan Pitelka on the Meiji transition in Japan.

    -Miranda

    #31352
    Anonymous
    Guest

    The item that struck me the most in the morning session was "Householdism rather than Individualism". Families during this era were focussed on maintaining the business. If one of their heirs were not capable of adequately taking over the business, the parents would "adopt" another person who would be capable. Also, they might have someone marry their daughter and that person would give up their family name and assume the family name of the adoptive family. This practice was new to me. I always thought that the Japanese family was focussed on family but did not realize that this could involve adopting someone else to "save" the strength of the family.[Edit by="ktarvyd on Jan 19, 8:52:56 AM"][/Edit]

    #31353
    Anonymous
    Guest

    I was also very surprised to learn about this practice. I wonder how easy or difficult it was to move within the hierarchical structure of Japanese society during the period. Or was it because of this focus on "householdism" that sped Japan's transition from feudalism through the Meiji Transition.

    #31354
    Anonymous
    Guest

    What I came away thinking about most from this session was the idea of perspective. In the morning, the idea came up with Japan being forced to open when Perry sailed in with gunships and how this event was portrayed differently by the German artist on board as compared to the images of the same event done by Japanese artists. It came up later in the afternoon with the Japanese perspective on the events leading up to and including the bombing of Pearl Harbor. The next day I watched Letters from Iwo Jima, which tells the story of this battle from the Japanese perspective and the idea was reinforced for me.

    In fact, I'd been thinking a lot about perspective and relativity already and I believe I'll make this the locus of my lesson plan. Teaching point of view and perspective is a language arts standards. It would be a unit that would build on the curriculum I already do. I was thinking of including a chapter from John Gardner's novel Grendel, which tells the epic poem Beowulf from the monster's perspective. The wife of Bath in the Canterbury Tales also references a tale by Aesop--in a footnote we learn about a painting depicting a man killing a lion and the comment that a leonine artist would have portrayed this event very differently. In the Renaissance and Romantic poetry we do, this idea can be examined through the two poems, "the Passionate Shepherd to His Love" and "the Nymph's Reply" as well as the cycle of poems, Songs of Innocence and Songs of Experience by Blake.

    I'm envisioning this unit as coming toward the end of the year and that would touch on a lot of curriculum we'd already examined through the lens of perspective. And I thought I could use the vehicle of Asian history and culture and the different genres that this might afford to teach the idea of perspective in a different way--show the images from the Visualizing Cultures website and show the Iwo Jima film. The culminating assignment I have in mind now would be a kind of copy change whereby students rewrite a poem, short story, or chapter from a piece of literature they already know from a different perspective.

    #31355
    Anonymous
    Guest

    I learned a lot about the structure of early Japanese family life and was also surprised by the idea of putting the business first. It is in stark contrast to many other cultures. It was also very interesting to see the hierarchal system with warriors at the top and the merchants at the bottom. I watched "The Last Samurai" for the first time last weekend. As Professor Pitelka had mentioned, it was a very "hollywood" way of romanticizing this period. But it was still interesting to see after the lecture on Saturday. Pitelka's session gave me a historical reference to share with my fellow viewers.

    #31356
    Anonymous
    Guest

    I came across an interesting documentary on manga as a literary genre. In Japan, comics are regarded as their own genre equal to novel, poetry, and drama. Manga Mad traces it back to the wood block prints of the Edo Period. Western culture did not have such easy access to easily and cheaply reproduced books of essays and poetry with images until it was too late. Western culture was conditioned to accept books of text as scholarly where Japanese culture accepts text and images. This became more important during the Meiji Period because these books were a very cheap form of entertainment.

    Watch Manga Mad.

    #31357
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Householdism seemed very foreign to me at first but as I thought about it I began to see similiarities in American history. The practice of householdism is not very far from how American farmers operated in our early history. Everyone pitched in and worked, no matter what the age. The farm was the business and everyone needed it to survive. Even in California we saw the bringing in of outsiders into the Spanish land grant families in order to keep the land in the "family'.

    Now when reading about the parasite singles, you still see a little householdism. Only now parents are still willing to support children, but evidently the children are not forced to contribute to the family, just are able to have a disposable income, and spend their money selfishly. I hope that is not a sign of westernization!

    #31358
    Anonymous
    Guest

    I think most of us didn't really know about the early Japanese family structure and were quite surprised by the idea of putting the buisness first, however I'm not so sure it is in stark contrast with our culture. It seems that family businesses are going by the way side, and that whatever it takes to succeed, many people will do. Maybe the Japanese figured this out first? Hence why they are so successful in the business world?

    #31359
    Anonymous
    Guest

    I think that here in American, we see many immigrant groups working hard as a family to succeed. Many times there are multiple generations of families living together in cramped quarters, all working to make a business successful. The difference that I see between that and Japanese householdism, is that I believe that in the U.S. most groups are working so that the next generation can go to college, not necessarily to take over the family business. That may be what we are seeing in Japan with adult children living with their parents without contributing to the household.

    #31360
    Anonymous
    Guest

    This lecture came at a great time for me. I was able to incorporate much of the information learned on Saturday into my lesson the following week. In world history we are learning about Western imperialism in Asia. The focus was on how Japan became a modern industrial power and how it was able to resist foreign rule. I was able to extend the lesson with much more detail regarding Tokugawa Japan & how the the Meiji emperor was inspired to modernize Japan.

    The students were really interested in learning about the social structure and family structure and many who are Japanese could relate to the cultural emphasis on "success" that is put upon them today by their own Japanese families. I hope to include a powerpoint in the lesson for next year with some of the woodblock art, and ancient maps of the region, details about Matthew Perry. This could also be used in U.S. history when students learn about American imperialism in the South Pacific.

    #31361
    Anonymous
    Guest

    I found the idea of victimization interesting. Prof. Pitelka mentioned that after the bombs were dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the Japanese were left with a sense that they were somehow the victims of this war. After seeing the images from after the explosions, it seems like that attitude may be justified. This idea that they must come out and tell the world that they were responsible for so many deaths during the war, and to almost say, "We're sorry", seems ludicrous after those bombs went off. I can't imagine in my wildest dreams the United States apologizing for military action. We are just better at justifying it. Please correct me if I am wrong, because I forget when the United States as a nation apologized to the Native Americans, or to the countless countries that we helped commit atrocities against their own people. How self righteous can we get? I mean we were the victims of a military attack during Pearl Harbor, but it was against a military base. I don't know, it seems pretty hypocritical whenever we point the finger. Thanks for the opportunity to rant.

    #31362
    Anonymous
    Guest

    I found it interesting that Japanese colonialism and imperialism seemed to begin once they began exploring the rest of the world. Also that there were "rules" of colonization that should be followed. That one was hilarious.

    On the occupation of Taiwan, I have relatives who grew up in Taiwan during the 50's and 60's whose parents really admire the Japanese and grew up speaking Japanese. There seems to be a difference between the way that Japan treated those places that it occupied early on in their "Colonial career", and the stories we hear of the Annex of Korea and the Nanjing.

    There was a novel that my school used to teach entitled "Clay Walls" concerning Koreans and the Annex period. The depictions of life under the Japanese during this time seems brutal.

    #31363
    Anonymous
    Guest

    I was also most struck by the focus on householdism vs. individualism for a variety of reasons. Individuals that are "adopted" lose all sense of who they are, as far as their new "family" and name are concerned.
    I am curious... do these people still associate/have relationships with their families?
    I was also very surprised at the idea of "retirement" as a real retirement is also interesting. I would have assumed that the eldest member of the family would still have control until the ranks were passed down upon that person's death.
    I am curious... does the shift of power resonate in all aspects of family life?

    #31364
    Anonymous
    Guest

    I also saw The Last Samurai last weekend. Though generally I would have less patience with Tom Cruise and the Hollywood formula aspects of it, given the history I had just learned, it was really enjoyable--as have been other Japan-related movies I've seen recently--Flags of Our Fathers, Letters from Iwo Jima and Ran. Context makes such a difference!

    I know Professor Pitelka said the Cruise character was fictional, but I wondered how much of the rest of it was historically accurate. I remember he said that Satsuma was seen as a hero, but I wonder if he was as sympathetic as he was portrayed in the movie, in which the samurai culture seems pretty idyllic, the oligarchs very antipathetic and the emperor totally ineffective and weak.

    #31365
    Anonymous
    Guest

    I thought the system of alternate attendance was really interesting. I haven't heard of anything like it anywhere else at any other time. I like the idea of the division between rural and urban being more fluid and having an educated, cultured, sophistical population dispersed throughout the country.

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 28 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.