4/28 - Pitelka - The Rise of Modern Japan
- This topic has 44 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 2 months ago by
Anonymous.
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 4, 2009 at 12:05 pm #28630
Anonymous
GuestI loved this lecture. I am truly fascinated by the rich culture and history of Japan. After learning about the warrior culture it was interesting to learn about the aftermath. The question what does a warrior do when there is no war....was answered...nothing. For me, as an art teacher, I enjoyed seeing the woodblocks. They really complimented Prof. Morgan Pitelks's lecture. I can really use those examples in my classes. I have yet to check out the website mentioned, but I look forward to it.
May 4, 2009 at 12:09 pm #28631Anonymous
GuestOh I almost forgot....following the timeline up to WWII really helped to fill in gaps in my own history knowledge. It really formed the connection of why Japan did what they did and of the aftermath. I am appalled at the state of Korea and Japan's part in it and I look forward to learning more about Korea this coming Saturday.
May 4, 2009 at 2:38 pm #28632Anonymous
GuestProfesso Pitelka was a very engaging speaker, and I'm glad he is coming back this Saturday! One aspect of his lecture that I found particularly interesting was Japan's "Closed Country" policy. This had been mentioned in other lectures, but to really understand it from beginning to end was fascinating. It was also interesting to read the letters sent from the President of the U.S. with Perry to basically bully Japan into opening its borders. These primary source documents in the reading packet were great.
May 5, 2009 at 7:40 am #28633clay dube
SpectatorProf. Pitelka mentioned the Tokugawa status system in his recent lecture. In the Asia in My Classroom forum, the teaching about contemporary Japan thread includes a post on how Google Earth has received attention for sharing old maps of Japan that identify districts where outcasts, the burakumin lived. Go to http://uschinaforum.usc.edu/showpost.aspx?PostID=12213 to learn more and to respond.
May 6, 2009 at 4:00 am #28634Anonymous
GuestContinuing with Clay's post, there are still "burakumin" in Japan today and they still live in certain areas. It is no longer codified, but old habits die hard. Attitudes have changed, particularly among young Japanese who have grown up in the post WW2, post-boom days. They seem to have a curiosity and respect for other cultures that is glaringly absent in America. At the same time, Japanese do have a strong sense of uniqueness. It is difficult to become Japanese. An either "you are or you aren't" attitude exists. While in America, it is quite easy to naturalize and be accepted. In fact, many Americans assume others want to become American.
A Japanese friend of mine recently asked me "Do you consider Obama black and why? I said I considered him black based on his skin color and his fathers ancestry. He then told me he had asked his black friends the same question and that they had told him "no", Obama isn't black (the question may have become muddled at some point and have been more about being "African-American", but I don't know...the point was that Obama lacked some "cred." I found this somewhat similar to Japanese attitudes, so I asked him "Are my daughters Japanese?" (my wife is "full" Japanese). He hemmed and hawed and didn't answer the question. But the point was again obvious; even though my daughters have a Japanese mother and Japanese passports, they lack some "cred" in Japanese eyes.[Edit by="mlloyd on May 6, 11:02:02 AM"][/Edit]
May 8, 2009 at 6:39 am #28635Anonymous
GuestI enjoyed the lecture and appreciated actually making it into the 20th century for a change. Dr. Pitelka was an engaging speaker. I liked the information re: the Japanese government's fact-finding tour. The idea that a country would spend the time to learn about other countries on a quest to modernize is impressive. I wonder if Gilbert and Sullivan wrote/produced the Mikado during this time period?
May 8, 2009 at 6:41 am #28636Anonymous
GuestGreat website. Tons of interesting and user friendly information. Thanks
May 8, 2009 at 12:05 pm #28637Anonymous
GuestI agree entirely -- the desire of the Japanese government to send ministers to determine just what it was about the western nations that made them so powerful is incredible. I thought the story of the tour through the United States and Europe especially interesting as the Japanese delegation became something of an exotic entertainment for the elite in the cities that they visited. I also thought it was interesting that they noted that Europe was a better model for them as the traditional the modern existed there, whereas in the United States they encountered only the modern.
May 10, 2009 at 1:06 am #28638Anonymous
GuestI used the MIT website about the Black Ships with my students this last week. They were surprised to see how different the east and the west depicted the same scenes. I had them discuss the reasons behind these ideas and it was amazing to see how they thought. 6th graders were a little young to think deeply about these issues, but they were able to come away with a new perspective on how countries interact with each other.
May 11, 2009 at 1:28 am #28639Anonymous
GuestSomebody had asked during this class why Japan signed the Tripartite Pact with Germany and Italy. I researched this in Reichauer and Craig's history of Japan. They report 4 reasons why Japan entered the Tri-Partite Pact in September 1940:
1) Japan wanted better relations with the USSR
-Japan had fought battles with the USSR during the summer of 1939
-Germany was on good terms with the USSR and helped Japan sign a neutrality pact with them in April 1941
*Germany then went ahead and attacked the USSR in June 1941
*Japan honored the neutrality pact with the USSR and did not attack the USSR as Germany wanted2) Japan wanted control of Asian colonies held by Allied European countries
3) Japan thought this would help end war in China
4) Japan thought this would isolate the USA
*this failed as Americans now lumped together Nazi Germany, Fascist Italy, and Japan.More interesting for me, why did Germany help Japan sign a neutrality pact with the USSR when they were planning on invading the Soviet Union and would want Japanese help in the East. What would have happened if the USSR's military had been bogged down on two fronts?
And why did Germany declare war on the USA after Pearl Harbor? How long might the USA have stayed out of the European war?
Japan's decisions it seems to me were all highly calculated and not necessarily doomed to failure. But they were playing against some long odds. In the end, the government brought about tremendous suffering, not only in other countries, but upon its own people.[Edit by="mlloyd on May 11, 8:30:27 AM"][/Edit]
May 14, 2009 at 5:12 am #28640Anonymous
GuestHow did you present the MIT website? Did you take them to a lab or simply project the images onto a projector screen? How did you students react to the MIT website format? Did they get a chance to go into the text based pages? Please hit me back - thanks..
May 14, 2009 at 8:12 am #28641Anonymous
GuestI used a projector to show the images-our lab does not work. I just took them through the pictures to show the different perspectives and then explauined about how the pictures the Japenese created exhibted their thoughts on the Western intrusion. At first glance, they did not understand why the Japanese looked like cartoons and the western depictions looked more realistic. After the explanations of what the pictures were really representing they had a different appreciation for how different this point in history was viewed.
May 17, 2009 at 12:04 pm #28642Anonymous
GuestMuch was gained from this session. Professor Pitelka's information was beautifully concise and easily understood. Thank you! The isolationist period of time in Japan's history seemed very poignant to me. They tried so hard to maintain their identity and in the end were forced to relinquish so much of it. We Westerners were so pushy as we labored to become industrialized, prosperous, and pompous. In some ways the Japanese are to be envied. They could choose with a great deal of clarity how they would change after WWII despite the influence of the Allies. It is much to their credit that their contemporary society has achieved a comfortable balance between their seats of power.
Admiral Perry's letters are a terrific primary source to teach from. They should certainly be incorporated, along with Fillmore's letter into a strong launching point to teach the end of the isolationist period in Japan's history. I think it ironic that we call this the "opening" of Japan. I wonder what the Japanese call it in their history books. It would be interesting to find a primary source that reflects current Japanese thinking on this topic. A good way to point out bias in writing for an ELA lesson co-taught with 7th grade history.
May 21, 2009 at 11:12 am #28643Anonymous
GuestAlthough, throughout the year I only get a chance to discuss the topics addressed in the first half of this session- i definitely would like to include some of the information about more modern Japan into a wrap up of the unit with my kids.
This is what I would like to bring to my classroom:
1. The Ie System- to discuss the meaning of names, and the importance of occupation and social status, understand Japanese census at the time.
2. Status System- discuss the system and go into a deeper analysis of the connection between beggars' and outcasts' with death. Why might have Japanese society equated the social class with physical or spiritual demise? Then connecting that to today- who is a beggar in our society? who is an outcast in our society? Do we relate beggars and outcasts with death? Why or why not?
3. Tokugawa Shogunate and the System of Alternate Attendance- talk about shogun's methods of avoiding conspiracies/ plotting against him by implementing this system. Discuss the movement of ideas through these semiannual migrations as well as the cost of being a warlord (military training)
May 21, 2009 at 11:43 am #28644Anonymous
Guestone more thing- I reviewed "Samurai Fiction" in the film festival thread under the Asia in my classroom-
This film can be used to illustrate society during this time period- it takes place during the Tokugawa Shogunate. It mentions the importance of clans, adoption and also, although maybe superficial, shows examples of the Floating World- gambling houses, geishas, etc. -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.