Home Forums Session 10 Discussion

Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #2348
    Rob_Hugo@PortNW
    Keymaster

    Mike Chinoy is a fascinating speaker. I was so interested to hear his first hand testimony of being in China in 1989, during the standoff between protesters and the government. His documentary vividly details the events that led up to the clearing of the square, the loss of life, and the harmful attempt to cover up how it happened. I loved hearing the political drama surrounding Gorbechev's visit and how journalists were let in, later to experience a shut down of their satellite feeds. It was so dramatic hearing Mike and others speak of how he was forced to stop the live feed. Other journalists were right in the middle of the conflict. Journalists are there to witness history. They are there to report, to share with the world what is happening. And Mike Chinoy demonstrated that so clearly. My Stduents would greatly benefit from seeing this important documentary. I would love to show them after they finish their unit on the Chinese Cultural Revolution and read some more current events. I would love to go back and show them. How wonderful that it is available to watch.

    #14778
    Anonymous
    Guest

    What an absolute honor to be treated to a day of listening to and asking questions of two prominent yet approachable journalists about their encounters with the Tiananmen Square incident in 1989 and its aftermath.

    From Mike Chenoy, I learned that the protestors were seeking to accelerate the party's reformation, not a but not a counter-revolutionary rebellion. The demands were neither unreasonable, nor without merit in seeking freedom of travel, educational opportunities, etc...

    From Louisa Lim, I learned about the legacy of an incident China would prefer to be forgotten as George Orwell imagined in 1984, in which Winston Smith's job in The Ministry of Truth was to rewrite history to suit the shortcomings of the present by eradicating any unsavory truths out of existence and sugarcoating any facts that had even a small semblance of palatability. She is seeking to undo Winston-esque work by exposing the glaring reality that 1[font=-webkit-standard]989 changed China and China rewrote history to eradicate the memory of the event. So perhaps, Orwell was just off by about five years in his seminal work.[/font]

    Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
    • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.