In some respects, the Korean companies that dominate K-pop are following in the footsteps that Japanese companies pioneered. They still turn them out: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hIGsBI2Qlf0 . Here's an article about the industry in Japan: https://medium.com/ignition-int/japanese-idols-will-transform-the-world-entertainment-business-b6975f6e588c
Today, though, Korean acts are far more popular. The Korean Cultural Center has space devoted to Hallyu, the Korean Wave. It is a very serious business. Here's an article about K-Pop from Harvard Business Review: https://hbr.org/2016/11/k-pops-global-success-didnt-happen-by-accident
The marriage question will be the focus on Lisa Tran's presentation on Thursday. She's an expert on how the Republican and Communist states sought to promote the rights of women, but to also deal with the reality of concubinage.
Just a quick note - the filial piety comics are part of a big series produced in Singapore. There are books on all the philosophers and many other topics. http://asiapacbooks.com.sg/Catalog/2/Comics
This approach is well established in Japan, where there are manga to teach about economics and many other questions. Back when some Americans were worried about Japanese economic dominance, the University of California produced Japan, Inc.: https://www.amazon.com/Japan-Inc-Introduction-Japanese-Economics/dp/0520062892
And there are serious (and sympathetic) comic treatments of Mao: https://www.amazon.com/Mao-Beginners-Rius-Friends/dp/0394738861
Eva raises a great question about mandates on male behavior. Most of early Chinese philosophy is aimed at men, how they are to cultivate their best natures and such. In a male-centered world, there is a lot of attention to "making men" and "making men better." Most of those authors neglect women and treat them as objects, when they consider them at all.
One exception is Mencius, who focuses on men, but does highlight the vital role his own mother played in raising and teaching him (she moves to get him into a better environment). http://chnm.gmu.edu/cyh/items/show/189
We included coverage in Assignment:China:
program launch https://china.usc.edu/assignment-china-opening
forced abortions https://china.usc.edu/assignment-china-1980s
Taiwan became the first Asian jurisdiction to permit same sex marriages. Here are some links:
US-China Today (our student-driven magazine): https://uschinatoday.org/features/2019/02/23/qa-with-yu-mei-nu-on-same-sex-marriage-in-taiwan/
About same sex relationships in China, student Ashley Jiang on her OutChina project: https://uschinatoday.org/features/2017/02/03/outchina-sources-of-hope-for-chinas-lgbt-population/
Men marrying into families happens mainly when families lack a male heir, which has become common with the family planning program. In earlier times, it mainly involved families bringing in a male from a poorer family to ensure they would have a descendant. This has also happened in Japan.
The One Village in China series by Carma Hinton and Richard Gordon captured giant American audiences in the early 1980s. Her father (who she didn't live with because she stayed with her mother in Beijing when William Hinton returned to the US). The Hinton story is an interesting one.
Hinton's Longbow group: http://www.longbowgroup.com/about.html
William Hinton wrote Fanshen (and a follow-up Shenfan) about land reform. An obituary: https://www.theguardian.com/news/2004/may/24/guardianobituaries.china
Joan Hinton, a physicist and Bill's sister, stayed behind in China working on farms. Her obituary: https://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/12/science/12hinton.html
The two laws first implemented by the Communist Party-led government after 1949 were the land reform law (text: http://www.bannedthought.net/China/MaoEra/Rural/AgrarianReformLawOfPRC-1950.pdf posters will interest students: https://chineseposters.net/themes/land-reform.php) and the marriage law. That signals what a priority it was. The aim, though, included breaking the authority of lineages and parents, making the state the authority on such a fundamental aspect of life. Here's the text of the marriage law: http://www.bannedthought.net/China/MaoEra/Women-Family/MarriageLawOfThePRC-1950-OCR-sm.pdf
How might one use these laws with students? Note that China has a national law. Under the family planning regime, however, local areas could set higher marriage ages (not lower).
Hi Folks,
Apologies for not getting to the family planning question today. The short story is that the program was, in retrospect, unnecessary and came at great cost. China's population growth was already slowing. With urbanization, industrialization and continuing education of females, that decline would have continued - as it has everywhere else. China's leaders at the time the program was implemented (Deng Xiaoping and others) can be cut some slack, however, since no one could have anticipated the rapidity of China's economic transformation. They literally feared a population catastrophe if they didn't intervene in a drastic way. The best academic studies of this are by Susan Greenhalgh and and Neil Diamont. An excellent journalistic account on the consequences of the policy is Mei Fong's One Child. (Watch the videos on our site of her discussing the book.). The key slide showing that the trend lines in the late 1970s were good is #66.
You're free to use this presentation with your students, but please do not post it to the internet or otherwise distribute it.
I've also attached digital copies of the three handouts from today.
You've got info on the 1950, 1981 marriage laws. Here's a link to the 2001 marriage law: https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Marriage_Law_of_the_People%27s_Republic_of_China_(2001)
Hi Everyone, Delighted to read about you folks. Thank you all for joining the seminar. We have some returnees, but most participants are coming to the USC U.S.-China Institute for the first time. We believe you'll have a great experience and will leave with some ideas to use with your own students.
I am a historian and have taught in the US and China for a long time and at various levels. My favorite activities involve exploring small towns and big cities, taking photos, watching movies and reading. I've worked with Catherine for quite some time. Over the course of the seminar, you'll also meet other USCI staffers Venus Jones and Craig Stubing. Don't hesitate to ask any of us questions.
Have you joined the Teaching about Asia Facebook group yet? What's holding you back? Terrific content at: https://www.facebook.com/groups/teachingaboutasia/
Steinberg, Julie. Wall Street Journal (Online); New York, N.Y. [New York, N.Y]21 Mar 2019.
The company's actions have rankled some teachers. Typically, these instructors have displayed maps of the world, including China, that they found on their own. Starting last fall, hundreds began receiving emails or calls from VIPKid stating their maps weren't aligned with Chinese education standards, people familiar with the matter said. Teachers who refuse to adhere to the map standards could have their contracts terminated, after conversations with VIPKid. Map-related dismissals haven't happened, said a person familiar with the company.
A Chinese education company backed by U.S. investors including Kobe Bryant is cracking down on how its Western teachers cover politically fraught topics.
VIPKid, one of China's most valuable online education startups, has put hundreds of its mostly American teachers on notice for using certain maps in their classes with Chinese students, and has severed two teachers' contracts for discussing Taiwan and Tiananmen Square in ways at odds with Chinese government preferences, people familiar with the company say. Since last fall, teachers' contracts state that discussing "politically contentious" topics could be cause for dismissal, according to one reviewed by The Wall Street Journal.
The moves highlight the balance a Chinese company must strike in fulfilling global aspirations while toeing Beijing's line. Five-year-old VIPKid is currently in talks to raise as much as $500 million in new funding from U.S. and other investors that could value the company at roughly $6 billion, people familiar with the fundraising said.
"A company must keep good relations with the government and ideology," said Peter Fuhrman, chief executive of investment firm China First Capital. "But that can cause friction when you're also courting foreign investors, expanding business overseas and employing a large American workforce."
Beijing-based VIPKid says it has more than 60,000 teachers in the U.S. and Canada who teach English to more than 500,000 children ages 4 through 15, who live mostly in China. Teachers work as independent contractors and can earn between $14 and $22 an hour. They must have a bachelor's degree, at least one year of teaching experience and eligibility to work in the U.S. or Canada.
Curricula are provided, and teachers give English-language instruction, sometimes using geography or historical figures. VIPKid's approach is consistent with maps and materials in the Chinese education curriculum, which calls Taiwan a part of China. Textbooks don't mention the military's suppression of the Tiananmen Square pro-democracy demonstrators in 1989, and discussion of it is forbidden.
A spokesman said VIPKid has "an elevated level of responsibility to protect the safety and emotional development of the young children on our platform." The company expects teachers to understand cultural expectations, he said, adding it had to "make a difficult decision" to terminate the contracts of "an exceptionally small number of teachers" who "decided to ignore the needs of their students" and "the preference of their parents."
Western companies including Gap Inc. and hotel giant Marriott International Inc. have been forced to apologize in the past for online communications, websites or merchandise that angered Beijing or Chinese consumers on issues including Taiwan and Tibet .
Chinese education technology attracted $5.3 billion in investment last year, double the amount a year earlier, according to Dow Jones VentureSource data. VIPKid's investors include U.S. hedge-fund firm Coatue Management LLC, venture-capital firm Sequoia Capital, Chinese social giant Tencent Holdings Ltd. and a venture fund co-launched by retired NBA star Kobe Bryant.
Will Rodgers, a 26-year-old American teacher based in Thailand, said he discussed Tiananmen Square twice during VIPKid lessons about famous Chinese landmarks. First, he told a 12-year-old student "the Chinese government jailed and killed many people just for protesting." He then showed a 15-year-old student photos and video footage of the protest, and his contract was terminated. Mr. Rodgers said he doesn't agree with VIPKid's stance, but doesn't blame the company for ending his contract.
Another American teacher's contract was terminated earlier this year after he told students that Taiwan was a separate country, according to people familiar with his case. A third teacher received a call from VIPKid after telling a student that Tibet, an autonomous region in China with a history of separatist activity, is a country, during a lesson on China's neighbors, according to a person familiar with the matter. He was told on the call he should refer to Tibet as part of China.
People familiar with VIPKid say it monitors classes for missteps over political content. Another person familiar with the matter said the company uses artificial intelligence to determine material students find engaging and to protect them from inappropriate behavior.
Some teachers and VIPKid investors say that education from foreign teachers, even if it is screened, can benefit students because they get exposed to other cultures. Rob Hutter, a founder and managing partner of Learn Capital, an early investor in VIPKid, said the company is trying to take a common-sense approach by teaching uncontroversial content.
"No matter what nation you're teaching in, there are going to be things that we need to be thoughtful about," he said. "Even in American classrooms, there are things you cannot discuss."
Write to Julie Steinberg at [email protected] and Shan Li at [email protected]
Hi Folks -
Here is a 20 minute presentation by David Shambaugh that draws on the article you've been asked to read and his book.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DqYtCiJWHxM&feature=youtu.be&list=PLZoSvm2n7tkeB583HbdB7CyPgJ_cL1y7G
Shambaugh has given a couple of other lectures at USC on soft power and China goes global.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sc2Cd-rD7fI
Ricardo, delighted to hear that you were so immersed in the film. I'm glad you posted your response to it here, but please also be sure to post your review in the "Film Festival" forum. https://china.usc.edu/k12/forums/forums/film-festival
Great to read all the thoughts about how best to deal with one's law-breaking father. Confucians feel a duty to remonstrate with him, to tell him they feel he did wrong and must make amends, that he must be a proper good-example setting father (rectification of names). Mohists have similar ideas, but note that one should feel similar responsibility to educate ALL fathers who stray (universal love). Daoists aren't much concerned, particularly if they judge the law to be unnatural in some way. Legalists didn't blink, but rather just turned dad in, knowing they would be liable if they failed to do so. Legalists see one's primary responsibility as being to the state.
Thanks for all the great responses. Please suggest other questions that might get students thinking about how these philosophies might work in action.